Wednesday, May 02, 2007

AMD X2 6000+ frags Intel quad core Qx6700

In Matlab, Pro/Enginer, SolidWorks, and Apache web server benchmarks, the X2 6000+ frags the Intel QX6700 quad.

In file compression, audio encoding, the difference is around 5%. The only thing Intel qaud showed some real advantage is video encoding.

K10 will whip the crap out of Intel's double cheeseburger architecture.

73 Comments:

Blogger Randy Allen said...

AMD's architecture is a joke. 6000+ clearly fragged by even the E6600: http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q2/core2-qx6800/wme.gif

4x4 is soundly fragged by Intel's lowest end quad core product.

Intel has Core 2 Duos at every price point. No one wants to buy X2s anymore. AMD's market share is crashing to record lows. AMD has to take on more debt just to survive.

The only desktop processors AMD is selling above $250 are the 4x4 processors. But no one wants them, not when you can get a Core 2 Quad Q6600 for $550 that will frag an FX-74.

R600 is a joke. It is left to contend with Nvidia's third fastest GPU. AMD is finished.

AMD BK Q2'08.

9:51 PM, May 02, 2007  
Blogger amw said...

With K10 so close now it's not worth really still comparing K8 to the latest Intel offerings, I think most people admit that the newer Intel chips are better than AMD in most things whilst consuming less power.

K10 should be better, one would hope, and it will be interesting to see the match up against Penryn.

10:16 PM, May 02, 2007  
Blogger lex said...

Another "Ph"ony "D"octoring of data from the PhD.

Where is a side by side of Barcelona against top of the line Clovertown? Where is it in clear side by side with frequency, power and configuration displayed? It ain't anywhere to be found because it ain't that far ahead. I fully expect it to beat Clovertown. If it doesn't it'll be AMD's netbust.

The fact it "frag" as the "Ph"ony likes to say isn't revelant.

Barcelona is too big on 65nm to ship in any signficant volume to effect business/pricing or market share.

Penrym will be competitive and INTEL will have volume behind it. 4 45nm factories and its a small die even when you slap two of them in a package it will be far more silicon and yield efficient.

Barcelona benchmarks are not enough to save AMD from going BK.

COntinued fraging only shows that the "Ph"ony can't address the real problem AMD has.

TO little silicon manufacturing for too big a die.

10:20 PM, May 02, 2007  
Blogger yomamafor2 said...

Sharikou.. you're such a trolling fanboy.

According to the test, Core 2 not only won benchmarks in Image/video processing (up to 30%), compiling (10%), synthetic (30%), packing (7%)... it also has the lowest full load power (95 watts). A dual core processor's full load power consumption is even higher than a quadcore processor, and still cannot outperforms it.

Also for the benchmarks that AMD managed to pull ahead, the review also wrote the explanation for it:

Web server app (Apache): We believe that might be due to a very specific L2 cache structure of QX6700 (two dedicated L2 caches for each couple of cores.) Because of this it can't operate "correctly" with Windows XP task manager. When the latter moves threads from one core to another, sometimes threads get to cores using another set of L2. As a result, it has to "re-cache" all thread data, but this places a heavy load on memory subsystem and, consequently, leads to a performance loss. It's a good example of that you shouldn't hurry. If a concept of shared L2 for all cores is approved, you should use it in all products. However, you can act simpler - clarify to Microsoft how threads should be distributed among cores of the very specific QX6700.

So, 6000+ only managed to outperforms Q6700 in three benchmarks (Matlab etc).

Sharikou, get educated, you're making yourself a fool here.
http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1053
3-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=21712&
messageID=413491&start=-9774

10:50 PM, May 02, 2007  
Blogger pezal said...

Wow… the claimed fastest processor in the world QX6700 get shamed by the old underdog processor in Matlab, Pro/Enginer, SolidWorks, and Apache web server benchmarks.. What a shame!

11:40 PM, May 02, 2007  
Blogger pezal said...

Intel multicore processors causing trouble to DELL and HP servers..

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=802&Itemid=1

12:36 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger MC7447a said...

Comparing dual and quad cores in this context is a bit pointless, since some applications don't benefit at all from the extra cores. More interesting is that the 3.0Ghz X2 with 2MB cache is on average 34% faster than the 1.8Ghz C2D with 2MB cache (and 800Mhz fsb). This translates to a 24% advantage per Ghz of the C2D, which is consistent with most earlier reviews.

1:06 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Giant said...

Core 2 Quad Q6600 frags FX-74 4x4 setup. Yes. One 2.4Ghz CPU from Intel frags two 3Ghz CPUs from AMD. 4x4 CPUs need 250W of power. Intel Quad Core only needs 105W, or a meagre 42% of AMD's 4x4 spaceheater.

More bad news for AMD:-

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=803&Itemid=1

Not content with having 90nm junkyard spaceheater CPUs AMD has expanded that to GPUs! 100C!

R600 is also noisy!

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=800&Itemid=1

R600 also needs a 750W PSU to run!

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=791&Itemid=1

It also takes up 240W of power, this is rediculous.

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=788&Itemid=1

So we have AMD 90nm spaceheater garbage CPUs. Now R600 spaceheater garbage, far slower than the 8800 Ultra while consuming 240W of power and reaching 100C! Also very noisy!

AMD may as well enter the space heater business, they'd make a fortune and would be profitable again in no time at all!

1:18 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger yomamafor2 said...

pezal
Intel multicore processors causing trouble to DELL and HP servers..
CONGRATULATION!!! you're the runner up for sharikou #2!

Fudzilla: Intel multicore troubles can crash a server

So far it has not caused any trouble yet, which will only occur under extreme conditions. However, you can fix the problem by installing a microcode patch and updating BIOS.

Nice try, Fanpoi

1:28 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Biby Cletus said...

Nice post, its a really cool blog that you have here, keep up the good work, will be back.

Warm Regards

Biby Cletus - Blog

3:49 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger pezal said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

6:30 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger pezal said...

Giant said..
Core 2 Quad Q6600 frags FX-74 4x4 setup. Yes. One 2.4Ghz CPU from Intel frags two 3Ghz CPUs from AMD. 4x4 CPUs


Actually, in Video Encoding FX-74 frags intel QX6700

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2065499,00.asp

From the benchmark above,

QX6700 -> DIVX Video encoding = 100 seconds
However, if you want to encode more than one video for example 2 DIVX videos, therefore you will waste about 200 seconds

FX-74 -> DIVX Video encoding = 126 seconds
But, with AMD FX-74, you can perform multiple tasks at the same time.
So, you will get only 126~130 seconds to encode 2 DIVX videos at the same time

Conclusion,
In hardcore videos encoding benchmark, FX-74 is 37% faster compare to Intel QX6700.

6:33 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger yomamafor2 said...

pezal
In hardcore videos encoding benchmark, FX-74 is 37% faster compare to Intel QX6700.

no offense, but how the h*ll did you get this number? running two instances of Div encoding? please quote the source to support your claim, not just a theory you thought up, and claim it as if its a fact.

However, if you want to encode more than one video for example 2 DIVX videos, therefore you will waste about 200 seconds

But, with AMD FX-74, you can perform multiple tasks at the same time.
So, you will get only 126~130 seconds to encode 2 DIVX videos at the same time


so with QX6700 you cannot run multiple tasks at the same time?

nice logic you got there bud.

7:30 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger howling2929 said...

Seems that a good chunk of the readers here come from /., as no one seems to have RTFA

From TFA (right at the end):

Conclusions
It's actually simple: Intel's current core is really better than that of AMD. Whether it's a fair 64-bit application, or an older 32-bit one; whether it's multi-way (multi-core) optimized, or is single-threaded classics. In almost every situation Intel Core 2 outperforms old AMD K8 even in its DDR2 modification. And this is so natural: a new core beats an old one anyway. On the other hand, this doesn't mean the show is over. One company just released new-core processors slightly earlier than the other. We've seen that before many times. Those who need the best performance here and now should select the current leader. And the followers of certain vendors may wait a bit all right, until it acts in return. And judging by our experience, we are sure AMD is bound to act...

7:41 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger abinstein said...

"In almost every situation Intel Core 2 outperforms old AMD K8 even in its DDR2 modification. And this is so natural: a new core beats an old one anyway."

This is just plain wrong. Core 2 beats K8 in probably 3/4 workloads, which are benchmarked repeatedly to depth by all the "independent" websites. However, the performance wins of Core 2 is by no mean unanimous. There are a few important applications, such as security and most engineering and server workloads, where K8 still performs better.

9:39 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Tar said...

pezal said...

Actually, in Video Encoding FX-74 frags intel QX6700

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2065499,00.asp

From the benchmark above,

QX6700 -> DIVX Video encoding = 100 seconds
However, if you want to encode more than one video for example 2 DIVX videos, therefore you will waste about 200 seconds

FX-74 -> DIVX Video encoding = 126 seconds
But, with AMD FX-74, you can perform multiple tasks at the same time.
So, you will get only 126~130 seconds to encode 2 DIVX videos at the same time

Conclusion,
In hardcore videos encoding benchmark, FX-74 is 37% faster compare to Intel QX6700.


LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

That has to be the single most "intelligent" post I've read, ever :)))

10:51 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Heat said...

abinstein said: This is just plain wrong. Core 2 beats K8 in probably 3/4 workloads, which are benchmarked repeatedly to depth by all the "independent" websites. However, the performance wins of Core 2 is by no mean unanimous. There are a few important applications, such as security and most engineering and server workloads, where K8 still performs better.

Abinstein you genius a 3/4 victory in workloads would be considered unanimous in most circles where common sense prevails!!!

11:25 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Mike said...

So I was a bit perturbed by this blog post I went and checked up on the benchmarking site.

It didn't seem very professional at first glance, nor does the site have any *verifiable* reputation. (it's not tom, anand, or hard OCP ok')

Their test bed was stated to be Vista 64 bit, with 64 bit versions of Matlab, etc . . . - high end engineering applicatioins.

The graphs show the AMD beating i in 2 synthetic tests, but in the comments below the graph, you read

"Because of this it can't operate "correctly" with Windows XP task manager"

I thought the test bed was Vista 64?

Anyway, I write heavily threaded applications for a living, and since the quad has been out, i've been able to half and/or quarter the amount of load testing time it takes me.

Before I would believe a claim such as this, I suggest one of the reputable review sites conduct a 64 bit environment review of high end applications with both processors.

11:40 AM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger KingRichard said...

So AMD's 6.0 GHZ (2 X 3.0GHz), STILL kicks Intel's 10.64GHz (4 X 2.66GHz) in some tests.
Intel has a 77%+ advantage in clockspeed (10.64 / 6.0) over the AMD x2 6000+, so the results should look like:

3d Modeling (AMD: 131):
Intel QX6700: 231 (Actual: 166)

CAD/CAE (AMD: 150*):
Intel QX6700: 246 (Actual: 139)

Photo Processing (AMD: 133):
Intel QX6700: 235 (Actual: 186)

Compile (AMD: 136):
Intel QX6700: 240 (Actual: 151)

WEB Server (AMD: 135*):
Intel QX6700: 238 (Actual: 124)

Synthetic (AMD: 158):
Intel QX6700: 392 (Actual: 222)

Packing (AMD: 130):
Intel QX6700: 230 (Actual: 139)

OCS (AMD: 112):
Intel QX6700: 198 (Actual: 148)

Audio Encoding (AMD: 140):
Intel QX6700: 247 (Actual: 145)

Video Encoding (AMD: 128):
Intel QX6700: 226 (Actual: 178)

Games (AMD: 121):
Intel QX6700: 214 (Actual: 135)

Professional (AMD: 141):
Intel QX6700: 249 (Actual: 165)

Home (AMD: 126):
Intel QX6700: 223 (Actual: 149)

OVERALL (AMD: 134):
Intel QX6700: 237 (Actual: 157)


With those kind of numbers... Intel's Quad Core looks utterly Pathetic! And this is Intel's "EXTREME" edition...

At least now... This has made up my mind for me I think. I am waiting for the K10!

* - AMD has lead over QX6700

12:32 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger enumae said...

Sharikou

In Matlab, Pro/Enginer, SolidWorks, and Apache web server benchmarks, the X2 6000+ frags the Intel QX6700 quad.

AMD has about a 13% advantage in clock speed, but wins by 8% in single threaded test such as Matlab, Pro/Enginer, SolidWorks, and this is a win for AMD?

12:49 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Louis said...

And what was the margin in overall score??? Intel Core2 Extreme won by nearly 20% margin. Overall, most benchmarks were won by the Intel Core2 Extreme by a similar margin including the all-important games category.

Who buys desktop CPUs and runs Apache? Not me, not any IT managers either so you can pretty much throw that win away.

When looking at power consumption... the Athlon loses in every category to both Intel CPUs. Wasn't it Sharidouche who just last year was calling Intel CPUs space heaters? It looks like Athlons are the new space heaters.

I guess I can get an X2 6000+ at Newegg, but I can't buy one from Dell, Gateway, Apple nor HP. So again, who cares?

1:28 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Tim said...

"So AMD's 6.0 GHZ (2 X 3.0GHz), STILL kicks Intel's 10.64GHz (4 X 2.66GHz)"

That statement right there shows you know NOTHING about processor architecture...have a great day...

2:25 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger netrama said...

This is clearly the miss-step by AMD. If they had even a decent speed bump during the initial hype days of CORE2, Intel should have been on its way to BK by now. Instead they choose to be quiet. I think this is a lesson learnt by AMD. AMD should get fresh blood for it marketing. Everything beginning from their Webpage itself sucks big time. Hector says at the shareholder meeting ' "no money for marketing".... What is this ...is it a save a penny and loose a pound attitude???

Meanwhile Intel calls anything and everything a 'Core2' these days and continues to fool people even further with their sub par products.

2:30 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Ho Ho said...

abinstein
"There are a few important applications, such as security and most engineering and server workloads, where K8 still performs better"

Care to make a list of those applications (with benchmarks, of cource) that are relevant to real world?


kingrichard
"With those kind of numbers... Intel's Quad Core looks utterly Pathetic! And this is Intel's "EXTREME" edition..."

Now remove the benchmarks that do not use >1 cores.


netrama
"Instead they choose to be quiet

It was because they couldn't release a high clocking CPU that fast.

2:49 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger KingRichard said...

Tim Said:
That statement right there shows you know NOTHING about processor architecture...have a great day...


Yeah.. thanx Tim.. You seem to be a real genious with THOSE comments.

3:31 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Tim said...

"Yeah.. thanx Tim.. You seem to be a real genious with THOSE comments. "

Oh, I've already stated, the only reason I come here is for the humor factor and to point out idiotic statements such as yours and then heckle them and the owner of this blog.

Immature? Sure! Fun? You bet.

I have better things to focus my intelligence on than a bunch of fanbois on a blog that's filed in my humor section...

3:37 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Bubba said...

The only thing Intel qaud showed some real advantage is video encoding

What's a "qaud"

4:12 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Evil said...

I'm sure that qaud is part of AMD's most idiotic new names for the Barcelona and related processors.

Phenom sounds like some character from a really bad Japanese cartoon.

But we are talking AMD's marketing department here. We all know they ain't quite the brightest bulbs in the bunch.

5:42 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Giant said...

Phenom = Phenomenally Awful Performance!

6:45 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Tovan said...

To all the inteller who complaint, Shut the fuck up, and go fuck yourself with your Jewish Intel Crap Processor! Period

Intel Logo:
Intel Inside, Idiot Outside.

7:07 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Giant said...

As opposed to your German AMD processors? Is AMD trying to start the Fourth Reich? Heil Fuhrer Ruiz!

7:11 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger lex said...

Looks like them AMD fanbois are really getting desperate

Got no benchmarks
Got no Barcebalogna
Got a company billions in debt
Got a company with no roadmap

Got a CEO suing because he can't execute

Resorting to name calling ..
ouch ouch ouch.

Must suck to be a fan of company with such a crappy CEO and strategy

7:35 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Tovan said...

Do you have something against the Germans? why when we talk about the Jews it always comeback to Hitler and the Reich? Grown up! Anyway Germany always had the reputation of excellence in what it undertakes, and by the way processors are built there, but owner of AMD is an American manufacturer of integrated circuits based in Sunnyvale, California.

7:39 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Tovan said...

i'm sick of people as you about repeated and endless discutions who led to nothing, you waste your time get a real life!

7:46 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Christopher said...

Before I would believe a claim such as this, I suggest one of the reputable review sites conduct a 64 bit environment review of high end applications with both processors.

There is no such thing as a reputable review site. Tough if you want your own desktop. If you are a company, you should do your own testing.

Who buys desktop CPUs and runs Apache? Not me, not any IT managers either so you can pretty much throw that win away.

There are plenty of people who run servers with Linux on their own built boxes using desktop cpus with motherboards from Abit, Asus, name-your-favourite-manufacturer.

I have this HP DL380 with 1.5GB of RAM and two SCSI drives running M$ Exchange for a dozen mailboxes and the thing can barely handle its own filtering (RAM problem, not cpu) whereas an AMD 3000+ on a cheapo all-in-one ASRock motherboard with 512MB and two SATA disks running Linux for another dozen mailboxes for outsourced staff is always idle and has no issues at all.

Who buys desktop cpus and run Apache? Why, real engineers who know how to make the stuff perform and keep costs down.

Care to make a list of those applications (with benchmarks, of cource) that are relevant to real world?

Come off it ho ho. The only benchmarks for servers that you can trust are your own. eg: If you are running an SSL web server on Linux, you do openssl benchmarks. Of course, a desktop cpu from VIA might be a better choice for SSL performance.

8:53 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger oneexpert said...

Actually its intel who makes the space heaters.
My e6600 65nm on a intel platform draws 80 watts at idle and about 100 watts to read this blog with 106 watts with both cores loaded up.
My 65nm AMD AM2-4800 on a standard amd-ati platform draws only 44 watts at idle and about 50 watts to read this blog wiht 104 watts with both cores loaded.
Clearly the e6600 is a space heater not AMDs chips.
Maybe if you intel fanboys would buy yourselves a watt meter you would switch to AMD to help save our planet.
Frankly my AMD 4800 brisbane frags my e6600 99% of the time.
Intel does not have any power shaving platforms and chips, ex.d805 both cores loaded 190 watts, talk about a space heater.

9:04 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Randy Allen said...

oneexpert is a bumbling fool. When you look at the results from a reputable site you get the real results:

http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q2/core2-qx6800/index.x?pg=13

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and 4x4 consume more power under load than any other CPUs. Even the QX6800 monster. Furthermore, the QX6800 is rated for 130W TDP, while the 6000+ is 125W. Yet the 6000+ uses more power. So the stories of Intel using lower numbers than they should for the TDP is pure nonsense.

It's interesting to note just how energy efficient the Core 2 Duo processors are. Even the Extreme Edition X6800 uses less power than all other X2 CPUS aside from the slowest 3600+.

AMD BK Q2'08.

9:38 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger Heat said...

Oneexpert said: Frankly my AMD 4800 brisbane frags my e6600 99% of the time.

Since most of the AMD fanbois are resorting to talking out of their ass i mite as well join in the fun.....

You are rite i think the 4800 is better than a E6600 i wonder why AMD even bothered to release anything faster and continue to lose market share because of the inferior C2D.

Damn intel has bought off all the tech websites and now they are contributing to their agenda. I wonder why AMD released anything faster than a 4800+ since it is fast enough to take care of everything intel. Kinda stupid of them to even bother with barcelona since they are already the performance crown holders.

I love my 4800+ brisbane but i also have a Pentium II @ 400mhz and it frags my 4800+ brisbane 99% of the time and runs cooler as well you should check it out.

9:42 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger abinstein said...

"Care to make a list of those applications (with benchmarks, of cource) that are relevant to real world?"


You don't know the applications because they are not repeatedly benchmarked by those on-line sites. I have hand-on experience with lots of security (crypto) algorithms and K8 X2 4200+ performs about as fast as C2D E6600. So are channel simulations and coding.

Just how relevant are those applications? It suffices to say that there are more people running SSL than those doing video encoding; there are more depending on simulations and scientific/engineering performance than ray tracing.

If you think the highest processor performance is so important only because of gaming, or people showing off how fast they can encode their kids videos, then you are dead wrong.

10:41 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger yomamafor2 said...

oneexpert
Frankly my AMD 4800 brisbane frags my e6600 99% of the time.

this is EXACTLY the reason why no one uses "user review" to evaluate the hardware. The test environment is not controlled, and it is subjected to prejudice, like in this case.

Oneexpert, thank you for your outright lie.

How about this. My E6300 OC to 2.8 consumes less power at peak load than my older A64 3200+ at idle, while outperforms it 100% of the time.

Thus I've concluded that K8 architecture is completely obsolete compared to C2.

10:58 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger pezal said...

Randy allen said..
oneexpert is a bumbling fool. When you look at the results from a reputable site you get the real results:

yomamafor2 said..
My E6300 OC to 2.8 consumes less power at peak load than my older A64 3200+ at idle, while outperforms it 100% of the time.


Both of you are the bumbling fools intel fanbois! Even a monkey on a coconut tree also knows that a 65 years old man is heavier than a little 2 years old baby. Stupid fanbois!

11:22 PM, May 03, 2007  
Blogger yomamafor2 said...

pezal
Both of you are the bumbling fools intel fanbois! Even a monkey on a coconut tree also knows that a 65 years old man is heavier than a little 2 years old baby. Stupid fanbois!
Its just an illustration of how idiotic AMD fanpois are. Why don't you look over your "FX74 is 37% faster than QX6700" statement again, before calling me a fanboy.

12:05 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger pezal said...

Why don't you look over your "FX74 is 37% faster than QX6700" statement again, before calling me a fanboy.


What‘s wrong with my calculation?

FX-74 takes about 126~130 seconds to encode 2 divx movies at the same time (multiple tasks at the same time method) while QX6700 takes about 100s+100s=200 seconds to finish the job because you got to encode the movies one by one.

So, in mathematical calculation, 100s-(126s/200s)*100 = 37%

Is that clear for you?

5:37 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Ho Ho said...

pezal
"FX-74 takes about 126~130 seconds to encode 2 divx movies at the same time (multiple tasks at the same time method) while QX6700 takes about 100s+100s=200 seconds to finish the job because you got to encode the movies one by one"

1) where did you got the idea it encodes two movies simultaneously taking around 120s per movie?

2) what is the reason you can't have Core2 quadcore encode two movies simultaneously?

6:20 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger pezal said...

1)where did you got the idea it encodes two movies simultaneously taking around 120s per movie?

The idea was introduced by AMD LOL..

Multi-Core Performance - Made To Do More In Less Time
With AMD multi-core technology, you can run multiple applications quickly, seamlessly, and simultaneously. Now you have the freedom to work, play, and rock — all at the same time.

2) what is the reason you can't have Core2 quadcore encode two movies simultaneously?

What is your expectation if you encode the two movies simultaneously on intel platforms?

7:07 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Tim said...

"Tovan said...

To all the inteller who complaint, Shut the fuck up, and go fuck yourself with your Jewish Intel Crap Processor! Period

Intel Logo:
Intel Inside, Idiot Outside. "

And I bet you have a shaved head and are either from Montana or the south, aren't you you anti-semetic peice of shit.

And someone here had the audacity to comment on *my* intelligence? This kid's a god damned Nazi.

7:14 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger pezal said...

Tim said..
And someone here had the audacity to comment on *my* intelligence? This kid's a god damned Nazi.

In this case I think I agree with you Tim..

7:21 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Aguia said...

Sharikou,
here is one very good review for you to investigate.

HP AMD entry VS HP Intel entry

Now even the Athlon is better than the Core 2 Duo. Biased review? Or the others reviews are the biased ones?

7:39 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger doorknob_dan said...

Yup, Tim and Pezal, Tovan is behaving like a skinhead.

Hey Tovan, it's okay to call everyone fanbois and idiots, but using "Jewish" as a derogatory comment somehow suggests that Jews are inferior. Which they are not.

I would recommend that you apologize and then life can go on and you'll come off like a rational adult and regain some respect. Otherwise you should be banned. Really. There's no room in the world for more comments like that.

7:45 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Ho Ho said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

8:17 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Ho Ho said...

pezal
"With AMD multi-core technology, you can run multiple applications quickly, seamlessly, and simultaneously."

Ok, is there some particular reason why you can't do exactly the same with Intel CPU?


"What is your expectation if you encode the two movies simultaneously on intel platforms?"

Considering how little performance increase there was from FX62 to FX74 I can only conclude that they are not efficiently using all four cores neither on 4x4 nor QX. That means you should see similar performance increase on Intel and on AMD.

8:20 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Ho Ho said...

As for running several tasks in parallel, Intel seems to do better in it. An interesting note is that even decryption is faster than on AMD.

8:24 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Only AMD said...

Please for this sites sake please delete the profanity & racial remarks . Its not needed in this blog. Be adults & use the intelligence you have from all the years of schooling.

8:55 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Poke said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

10:22 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Poke said...

To all the inteller who complaint, Shut the fuck up, and go fuck yourself with your Jewish Intel Crap Processor! Period

Only thing AMD fanboys can do is resort to name calling and using derogatory terms.

AMD, "Smarter Choice"

10:23 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Heat said...

OnlyAMD:Please for this sites sake please delete the profanity & racial remarks . Its not needed in this blog. Be adults & use the intelligence you have from all the years of schooling

Sites sake........LOL i think this site was doomed ever since sharikou made his first blog entry. Now it is only good for laughing at desperate AMD fanbois.

Are you all that surprised by the immaturity of the posters given the content of this blog???

My pentium II @ 400mhz frags 4800+ brisbane 99% of the time!

10:56 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Cyberdine System said...

Hahaha Inteller are stupid as usual. Better using Germans expertise to make CPU than Intel using Jewish scrap. Fuck those who encourage Israel with Intel shit products you kill Palestinians and other arbabs people.

Long Live AMD!

And yes better a 4 Reich than your fucking sionist movement to control and eradicate people who stand against it.

11:09 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Tovan said...

it's no resort, it's fact.

AMD "smarter choice" indeed.

11:18 AM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Tim said...

"Tovan said...

it's no resort, it's fact.

AMD "smarter choice" indeed. "

Shut up and post no more, Nazi.

12:59 PM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Tim said...

" Cyberdine System said...

Hahaha Inteller are stupid as usual. Better using Germans expertise to make CPU than Intel using Jewish scrap. Fuck those who encourage Israel with Intel shit products you kill Palestinians and other arbabs people.

Long Live AMD!

And yes better a 4 Reich than your fucking sionist movement to control and eradicate people who stand against it. "

Hmmm....you can go take a flying leap with your Nazi friend Tovan then...

1:01 PM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Dr. Yield, PhD, MBA said...

This blog has officially descended into chaos. Given that the moderator does not seem to mind being used as a front for anti-semitic propaganda (hey tovan, ever think that Intel Israel might have Arab engineers too?), the blog has lost it's entertainment value.

I'm outta here. Last one out, turn off the lights.

5:01 PM, May 04, 2007  
Blogger Cyberdine System said...

"Tim said...

Hmmm....you can go take a flying leap with your Nazi friend Tovan then...

stfu you sionist scum!

12:01 AM, May 05, 2007  
Blogger Cyberdine System said...

Dr. Yield, PhD, MBA said...

I'm outta here. Last one out, turn off the lights.

Good one more out. Get out of here all of you Intellers! you contribute nothing here except bashing AMD stuff's and people who like it. I'm sick of you dumbass kids.

12:11 AM, May 05, 2007  
Blogger Ho Ho said...

cyberdine system
"Good one more out. Get out of here all of you Intellers! you contribute nothing here except bashing AMD stuff's and people who like it. I'm sick of you dumbass kids."

I wouldn't call AMD fanboys any better.

4:09 AM, May 05, 2007  
Blogger Cyberdine System said...

Ho Ho a dit...

I wouldn't call AMD fanboys any better.

It is intellers who drop shits on AMD blogger and forum! AMD fanboys have nothing to do with it. I recall that few Amd fanboys go to intel forum or blogger to bash intel. It is you intellers who always whines tirelessly because you can't accept other CPU makers to do better chips than intel.

9:36 AM, May 05, 2007  
Blogger Heat said...

Cyberdine system: Good one more out. Get out of here all of you Intellers! you contribute nothing here except bashing AMD stuff's and people who like it. I'm sick of you dumbass kids.

Yes damn you intel fanboys with your facts, links and your truth. Let us AMD retards stay here basking in our ignorance and talking out of our asses.

2:00 PM, May 05, 2007  
Blogger Tim said...

"Cyberdine System said...

"Tim said...

Hmmm....you can go take a flying leap with your Nazi friend Tovan then..."

stfu you sionist scum!"

Awww - did I offend your racist sensibilities. Tough shit, Nazi.

5:00 AM, May 06, 2007  
Blogger Tovan said...

I prefer to be Nazi than sionist, German make alot of breakthrough during second world war and as of today. The jews don't do anything good, only to steal technologies and do reverse engineering on everything they could get a hand on.

7:32 AM, May 06, 2007  
Blogger Tim said...

"Tovan said...

I prefer to be Nazi than sionist, German make alot of breakthrough during second world war and as of today. The jews don't do anything good, only to steal technologies and do reverse engineering on everything they could get a hand on. "

Nazi's did nothing but slaughter 6 million people...it must make you mother proud that you associate yourself with scum. At any rate, I'm through responding to you and your other Nazi friend, and I hope Sharidouche has the decency to ban both of you from his blog...

4:02 PM, May 06, 2007  
Blogger Cyberdine System said...

"Tim said...

Awww - did I offend your racist sensibilities. Tough shit, Nazi.


Listen moron, the jews(you must be one of them) are the plague of this world. You are responsible to have killed and still killing millions of mens and womens around the globe through time. Dig deep in your research and open your eyes because right now shit obstructed your vision.

Intellers as intel; are like sionist propaganda, throwing lies and misinformations everywhere + there speciality: to bash on competitive companies, praticing unfair business and mean toward others.

btw you should be baned like the others because you support the sionists.

8:40 PM, May 06, 2007  
Blogger Tim said...

Actually, you living pile of dogshit, I am an atheist, so while you may think you know a person by what he posts, you do not. Same can be said for Intel .vs AMD - I have an equal amount of AMD boxes as I do Intel boxes. I support both companies, and buy what gives me the best performance for my money for the task at hand at the time I am ready to buy.

Again, *you* assume by what you read in a blog that you know what a person is.

In your's and Tovan's case, I need not assume anything - your racist and anti-semetic statements give you both away for what you really are. Scumbags, of the worst sort, plain and simple.

Sharidouche - the only reason I enjoyed coming to this blog was the outlandish sillyiness that you post and the joy of flaming the ludicrious and oddball statements you and your followers make - however, since you have decided to let Nazi's like Tovan and Cyberdine post their anti-semetic opinions on your blog, I'll bid you good day and I hope your AMD dreams give you all you need. No more hits from this guy either, I don't run with racist scum.

12:59 AM, May 07, 2007  
Blogger Cyberdine System said...

Tim a dit...

Actually, you living pile of dogshit, I am an atheist, so while you may think you know a person by what he posts, you do not.

* Stop whining your mean propaganda about AMD and everything will be fine and ohhh i don't care what you are.

Same can be said for Intel .vs AMD - I have an equal amount of AMD boxes as I do Intel boxes. I support both companies, and buy what gives me the best performance for my money for the task at hand at the time I am ready to buy.

* I will say it again what are you doing, i don't care except the way you and your friends here treat AMD, Amd fanboys and Sharikou with disrespect. Everyone have the liberty to buy what they want but when you bashed a semi-conductor company just because it's not the one you like or choose is totally immature, and ungrateful.

Again, *you* assume by what you read in a blog that you know what a person is.

* Funny how you were quick to name me a nazi when i'm not one.

In your's and Tovan's case, I need not assume anything - your racist and anti-semetic statements give you both away for what you really are. Scumbags, of the worst sort, plain and simple.

* Ahh ok, so speaking against the sionists mean you're automatically a racist. What about you who speak so softly toward the Germans?! You gave me the impressions that you are racist either.

Sharidouche - the only reason I enjoyed coming to this blog was the outlandish sillyiness that you post and the joy of flaming the ludicrious and oddball statements you and your followers make - however, since you have decided to let Nazi's like Tovan and Cyberdine post their anti-semetic opinions on your blog, I'll bid you good day and I hope your AMD dreams give you all you need. No more hits from this guy either, I don't run with racist scum.

* Yeah this is your worst, just before quitting. Tell what your really think about a group of persons and situation that you are out of control. You show us that you are mean guy and disrespectful dispite the contrary you try to prove.

I won't cry because you left. It's a good thing.

11:22 AM, May 07, 2007  
Blogger Tovan said...

They didn't killed 6 million of Jews thats what the Jews told the all world and you ate the bait, because it's largely exaggerated the Nazi didn't have the capacity to killed let alone to burned 6 million when if fact the total numbers in all Europe as always been contradicted by the Jews themselves and by other Nations at the Nuremburg trials.

Let us leave our mother apart from the context, if you are to immature to face me in a conversation or to accept certain facts as true,then you have no place here and you may leave. It shouldn't be a great loss.

And nobody treats you by names, so i suggest you do the same for any of us including Sharikou and not Sharidouche.

nb: you ran off the line when you and the others started talking about the "Germans, myself and Cyberdine system" being Nazis, all i was trying to tell you and trust me it wasn't easy because even now you can't understand, is that the German have the knowledge and the know-how to build good processors and that the Israeli from my point of view are so so, ended.

6:01 PM, May 07, 2007  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home