Nvidia driver consistently crashes Vista
I had a few crashes already, the BSOD shows nvstor32.sys as the problem.
Others had similar problems with Nvidia. My ATI based system is rock solid.
posted by Sharikou, Ph. D. @ 10/16/2007 10:37:00 AM
Journal of Pervasive 64 bit Computing
Main Blog Page
Site Feed:
sharikou.blogspot.com/atom.xml
Blog Roll
Hot pages
sharikou.blogspot.com/atom.xml
Blog Roll
Hot pages
- Price War Strategic Analysis
- AMD and Intel Performance
- Intel's false performance claims
- AMD's Architecture Lead Persists
- AMD and Intel Performance
- AMD and Intel Architecture
- Bensley/Woodcrest and Athlon MP
- Bensley/Woodcrest is 2P only
- 64bit CORE Performance!
- Conroe Busted
- Capacity: AMD vs Intel
- Conroe's Impact
- AMD and Intel in China
- A Beautiful Picture!
- Temperature and System Reliability
- Google and AMD
- AMD's Grand Masters
- Intel's Predicament
- AMD and Dell
- NGMA Core and Colwell 6th Gen Arch
- AMD and Intel History
- The Tale of Intel and Anand
Analysis on IT trends and competitive strategies, with emphasis on micro processors, computer systems and networks. Based on latest news, backed up with real data, this site intends to provide a true and realtime picture of the fast changing IT landscape. This journal strives to be accurate on facts and sharp on criticisms. You may email your opinion to sharikou@yahoo.com or post comments here, be cool and intelligent.
About Me
- Name: Sharikou, Ph. D.
Freelance journalist on IT matters. Some of my writings have been published on online IT journals. Any original content on this journal is Copyrighted, but it's free for non-commercial use. Any Trademarks used on this site belong to their respective owners. Some of the pictures are links. If there is any issue with the content of this site, please email sharikou@yahoo.com .
Previous Posts
- This is kinda cool
- AMD drops prices on desktop CPUs
- Quad core K10 for $230
- AMD ready to push Intel into the ultra low end
- Woman lost RIAA case, face financial hell
- AM2+ HT 3.0 motherboard now available
- AMD 690G 25% faster than Nvidia 7050
- Intel's Core architecture cannot scale with clocks...
- Intel will be out of top 10 soon
- Intelers' words are disturbing
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Others had similar problems with Nvidia. My ATI based system is rock solid.
45 Comments:
Sharikou,
I guess you've given up trashing Intel and are now moving on to Nvidia.
Maybe you have caught wind that Intel's going to report blow-out Q3 earnings?
Are you developing a fever or something?
if you don't like Nvidia based motherboards, use an Intel based motherboard.
Rock solid, stable and fast.
Oh wait, you use an AMD processor. I guess you could use Via chipsets...
Sharidouche is still a moron.
Lol - its because the moron doesn't know how to use a computer...
First he says Vista bluescreens contantly (see other thread)
Then he blames his issues on Nvidia...
Maybe if you weren't running a TNT2 card? Learn to compute fucktard....
Gah - shows how much creedence I give this douche, I didn't read what he was crashing on....ah well he's probably trying to load last years drivers....
Intel quad core - 6Ghz.
http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?p=4386268#post4386268
AMD Quad Core - 0 ghz (Paper Launch)
AMD Earning Announcement THURSDAY.
I wonder what their profit...err... loss numbers will be?
I'm guessing $400 million plus....
WOW.
Look at those Intel numbers!!
When's that BK again?
Intel Corp., the world's largest semiconductor maker, said Tuesday its third-quarter earnings rose 43 percent as strong demand for notebook computers drove sales of the company's microprocessors.
Net income for the quarter ended Sept. 29 grew to $1.86 billion, or 31 cents per share, from $1.30 billion, or 22 cents per share, a year ago.
Revenue climbed 15 percent to $10.09 billion from $8.74 billion in the prior-year period.
Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial expected a profit of 30 cents per share on revenue of $9.62 billion.
In September, the company surprised investors by raising its revenue outlook to a range of $9.4 billion to $9.8 billion, citing strong worldwide demand for chips.
Intel President and CEO Paul Otellini said in a statement he expects revenue and operating income will continue to improve into the fourth quarter.
Time to pull a one_expert except that this is not bullshit and I won't inject lies like he does:
INTEL POSTS RECORD THIRD-QUARTER REVENUE
• Revenue $10.1 Billion, up 15 Percent Year-over-Year
• Operating Income $2.2 Billion, up 64 Percent Year-over-Year
• Record Microprocessor, Chipset and Flash Unit Shipments
• Net Income $1.9 Billion
• EPS 31 Cents
Highlights from Intel's earnings report which you can get at their website.
So how long before that Christian Howell the Third comes out and says that 1.9 billion in pure profit means Intel is about to go out of business since AMD will "only" lose 500 million?
How long before Abinstein says that Intel will go out of business because they don't use AMD's bullshit SoI process?
How long before Sharikou posts another offtopic and inane comment, like how Microsoft should have held up its console for 3 years to put in a crappy AMD chip, or how AMD/ATI is so great because its drivers occasionally work on Windows?
Lol -
Intel 10.1 billion in revenue, 1.9 billion in earnings, .31 per share, beats analyst estimates...
Sounds like even with lower ASP's Intel is turning a profit...
AMD is expected to post a loss of .62 cents per share....you do the math fuckwit....
AMD = Owned.
Sharidouce = Owned yet again.
Intel BK when you fucking dumbass?
AMD will be filing chapter 11 by Q208...
Intel quad core processors shipped during quarter: > 2,000,000
AMD quad core processors shipped during the quarter?
Anybody want to guess? 25k? 50k?
Sounds like even with lower ASP's Intel is turning a profit...
ASP's weren't lower, they were flat.
Intel is able to hold it's price, while AMD has to keep devaluing its processors.
Missed the flat part - thankd bubba...still... ;-)
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nothing but "fud"
"I can say, and I am responsible for what I am saying, that they have started to commit suicide under the walls of Baghdad. We will encourage them to commit more suicides quickly."
(rickets chirping)
What no spin from Sharidouche and his merry pack of dimwits???
That's right you can't spin it...like it or not Intel is VERY profitable, AMD is losing money, you can't deny the numbers staring you in the face...
Hector Ruinz (sic) and co. have bent AMD over and boned her a good one....
No FUD to it Only AMD, the earnings numbers are speaking for themselves.....
"God will roast their stomachs in hell for all this disinformation".
Nah he's not hated, not by everyone, he's just pitied, a source of ridicule and someone to make fun of to no end...He's a fuckwitted cockgobbler. Crude yes, but true. If Hector Ruinz (sic) were to appear before him, Sharibitch would fall on his knees and give him a blowjob.
Jeez,
Help make them billion$ & they fire you. 2,000 more jobs to be shed at chipzilla.
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Intel Corp., the world's No. 1 chipmaker, reported a 43% increase in third-quarter profit Tuesday, benefiting from a robust personal-computer market, but also announced plans to shed 2,000 more jobs as part of a continued reduction in staff.
I wonder if their opinion has changed about chipzilla since the 2,000 got a notice of impending imminent departure?
PhD "Ph"ony "D"octorate has moved on.
INTEL is so far ahead of AMD. Look at Q3 results for margins, sales, profits and the astounding prediction of 57% GM for Q4.
Its clear Barcelano and Phenom are going to be a none issue in the marketplace as Penrym ramps.
AMD BK in 2008
All these results are nothing. There is a new stepping of Barcelona coming, and with that AMD will increase clocks to 4.7Ghz because they use IBM's process and IBM has POWER6 CPUs that fast!
Intel's BK will be quick and violent and Hector's K10 troops destroy Intel. Intel BK by Q2'08.
Sorry, couldn't help myself! Now I don't know how these AMD fanboys pull that kind of garbage out of nowhere all the time.
Wow. 1.9bn in profit. That sounds like more than AMD will have in revenues! People just can't get enough of the awesome power of Core 2 Duo for notebooks and desktops.
Here's a great microcosm of why Intel is by far #1 and AMD is just a second-rate imitator (from the "30000 3dMark" Inquirer)
CEO Paul Otellini put the results down to great products and better worldwide demand.
He was graceful enough not to mention the competition - AMD - which has rather spectacularly shot itself in both feet this year.
Otellini showed no smugness in the press release. After the Intel debacles of the last few years, he will not be crowing but surely delivering shareholder value, going forward.
You see, Intel just goes out and does a great job and doesn't constantly bitch and blame other people for all of its problems. Unlike AMD where the only thing Hector does (when not giving himself fat bonuses or promoting ex-Motorola cronies who are running the company into the ground) is bitch about how terrible things are because evil Intel has to go out and actually build better products that people want to buy.
Hey Sharikou, you racist fucktard: Hector bitches and moans about Intel making all of life's problems the same way you bitch about jewish people! Maybe you two could go into group psychotherapy to learn that you should 1. Not be fucking racists; and 2. Learn to take responsibility for your own problems in life and not blame your own failings on others.
Sharikook, is now, 100% irrelevant in anything he says...not that what he said was relevant before, it's just now 100% official - he's a joke, a laughing stock, and should just close this blog down.
This is karma at work my friends...when you lie about your credentials (ie Ph.d, IT journalist, etc) it will eventually come and bite you in the ass...
Enjoy your job at Mcdonalds, Sharipoop, just shut this mess down before you embarass yourself further....
THANKS TO AMD
intel(copytel) profits are up thanks to AMD bearing all r&d developement costs for the nehalem(barcelona knock off).
About those intel numbers, they dont add up correctly.
Otellini must be using Enron accounting with intel cpu computers to figure profits.
intel still shrinking.
intel to lay off another 2000 workers in 4Q.
intel says they will lay off 2000 of there 90000 workers and then they will have only 86000 workers, this does not add up correctly.
intel is firing 4000 workers to end up at 86000, they must be using c2d pentium 3s to do there math, cause 90000 minus 2000 does not equal 86000.
intel (copytel) is going to knock off AMD superior technology for there new nehalem.
Intel(copytel) is going to copy the AMD geode for there new cpu for the OLPC.
BUY AMD, technology so good intel copies it daily.
BUY AMD hi performance, energy saving, low cost cpus, platforms, and video solutions.
"About those intel numbers, they dont add up correctly."
Why so? Does the voices in your head told you they were wrong?
90000-2000 = ~2.2% of total workforce. If AMD would fire around as much workers they would need to get rid of only ~365 workers. IIRC not too long ago AMD got rid of ~1000 workers.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Wow, you have learned to use exel to make linear predictions? Good for you.
So with less and less workers Intel has been able to earn more and more profits. Kind of hints to more efficient execution to me.
Now go make a similar thing for AMD too.
Uhhh, OneExpert:
Intel = Proft
AMD = Loss
So when is Intel going to BK? When was that again? Did you say BK or record profits in 2Q08?
I don't guess Sharikou ever stopped to consider that maybe it's just Vista that sucks?
Just for the fun, used 5 minutes digging out the host comments during the pre ATI merger era looking of nvidia comment ... since those AMD fans moan about NVIDIA here and there ...
http://sharikou.blogspot.com/2006/06/conroe-is-stopgap-solution-amd-4x4-is.html#links
...
Just like what Nvidia's SLI did to ATI, AMD 4x4 will force Intel to react. A 4x4 sticker is just like a SLI sticker: it devalues the competition.
isn't that fun? and i dun bother to dig further, be it comments from the host or from those fans ... :)
oneexpert once again proving he is nothing more than a blathering idiot.
Good going oneexpert! if the world didn't already know you have the intelligence of a pile of old dog shit, it now knows you have less intelligence than a pile of dog shit.
When you learn a little something on how a business actually works (and using AMD as an example, isn't, as right now they are not:
1.) Making money
2.) Making the investors in the company happy
3.) Delivering products on time
4.) Delivering products that can compete with its competitors products)
But since all you know how to do is cut and paste, I doubt you would be able to figure it out on your own.
I don't guess Sharikou ever stopped to consider that maybe it's just Vista that sucks?
it only sucks for people that are too stupid to know how to use it.
MORE LAY OFFS AT INTEL....
Intel to shed another 2,000 jobs
Off with their heads
By INQUIRER newsdesk: Wednesday, 17 October 2007, 12:32 PM
CHIP GIANT Intel is to slash its workforce by another 2,000 before the end of the year despite posting strong third quarter results.
The latest round of layoffs will bring to 8,000 the total number of Intel employees shown the door in 2007.
Chipzilla says the move is aimed at reducing costs by $3 billion over a two-year period.
The news came as Intel announced its latest quarterly results, saying demand was better than expected across its businesses and life was generally looking rather rosy.
Not quite so rosy if you just happen to be an Intel employee. µ
BUY AMD hi performance, energy saving, low cost, cpus, platforms and video solutions from a growth company.
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
I think the layoffs show that Intel is not taking AMD or the present situation for granted. The best time to cut costs and streamline operations is when things are going well and you can make changes gradually, instead of hacking and slashing in a panic.
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY UPDATE
intel 2005 120000 plus employees.
15000 employees fired.
profits up
intel 2006 105000 employees.
15000 employees fired.
profits up.
intel 2007 90000 employees.
2007 10000 employees fired.
profits up.
80000 employees left.
6.0 YEAR PROJECTION
2013 no employees left to fire.
lost 13333 employees per year.
no profits.
no intel
Maybe intel will become the first employeeless company.
If a semiconductor sells in the woods but there is no employee to take the money and no employee to record the sale is there still a profit?
Latest estimates show 10000 fired in 2007, accelerates intels disappearance.
BUY AMD hi performance, energy saving, low cost, future proof, cpus, platforms, and video solutions.
oneexpert you fucking retard, why don't you do a graph of AMD's profits?
Oh wait! They don't have any.
Why don't you graph AMD's losses vs. the loans they took out and tell us when they will need more money again to pay for stuff like R&D, salaries and such.
Once again, successful companies make money and yes, they even do layoffs if it can save them money.
You are an ignorant fuck who should have been aborted, or at least euthanized. Do your mom and her brother (your Dad) cry when they see you as they realize just how useless of a child they created in her corrtupted womb? Or has the previous years of inbreeding blinded her?
Hey OneFuckwit - All large companies lay people off. You have no understanding of economics, no understanding of how corporations work, and probably no more than an 8th grade education.
You, like Sharidork, are a uninformed, uneducated, moronic fucktard who's understanding of the semiconductor industry goes as far as knowing how to spell CPU.
So please, spare us your copyandpaste mentality and go play with your v-tech laptop in the corner like a good 5 year old...
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY UPDATE
intel 2005 120000 plus employees.
15000 employees fired.
profits up
intel 2006 105000 employees.
15000 employees fired.
profits up.
intel 2007 90000 employees.
2007 10000 employees fired.
profits up.
80000 employees left.
6.0 YEAR PROJECTION
2013 no employees left to fire.
lost 13333 employees per year.
no profits.
no intel
Intel never fired a large number of staff in 2005. It wasn't until 2006 that the layoffs began.
You see oneexpert, unlike you most of us here have a brain. Intel can't just fire 10,000 and magically have it's profit go up the same quarter.
Of course you're very curious as to why this is. I'll explain it to you. When they fire someone they have to pay them all the sick leave and annual leave (holidays) that the employee has accumulated. In addition to that, they have to pay a severance package. At my place of employment, for instance, this is four weeks of regular pay if you've been with the company for at least one year. This then goes up one week for each year of service with the company until you reach around 12 weeks.
So when you have to pay each employee thousands of dollars, and you're firing 10,000 people you're going to take a BIG hit on your earnings (or lack thereof, in AMD's case). The savings from a reduced number of staff won't be noticed until the quarters after the layoffs.
BUY AMD hi performance, energy saving, low cost, cpus, platforms and video solutions from a growth company.
How is AMD a 'growth company' when their revenues were down 30% YoY last quarter and profits were down a whopping 700% YoY last quarter?!
Giant - explaining this to him is like trying to explain physics to a retarded child - all you'll get is dumb looks and more of the same blathering idiocy...then he'll proceed to do exactly what he always does...
I really think oneexpert = sharidouche....
X-Fi is BSOD Vista 64 too unless i disabled CnQ.
My prediction:
Nvidia will buy Creative and then the Bugs will quadruple, BK is unavoidable and AMDATI is saved for the Grace of the Free Western World, as Intel has eventually disbandes all human workforce and the MeIII-OS of their robots caused them to hold production until SP1 is released years later!
My prediction: Your dad will stop having sex with his sister and stop producing retarded fucktards like you.
Post a Comment
<< Home