Analysis on IT trends and competitive strategies, with emphasis on micro processors, computer systems and networks. Based on latest news, backed up with real data, this site intends to provide a true and realtime picture of the fast changing IT landscape. This journal strives to be accurate on facts and sharp on criticisms. You may email your opinion to sharikou@yahoo.com or post comments here, be cool and intelligent.
Freelance journalist on IT matters. Some of my writings have been published on online IT journals. Any original content on this journal is Copyrighted, but it's free for non-commercial use. Any Trademarks used on this site belong to their respective owners. Some of the pictures are links. If there is any issue with the content of this site, please email sharikou@yahoo.com .
AMD's 95 watts is actually 75 in Intel's terms.
posted by Sharikou, Ph. D. @ 9/08/2007 09:34:00 AM
5 Comments:
AMD is done
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=735
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
GutterRat said...
AMD is done
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=735
The 2GHZ K10 is 22% faster than a 3GHZ Clovertown in SpecFP. Another failure on Intel's track record.
posted by Sharikou, Ph. D
AMD's 95 watts is actually 75 in Intel's terms.
http://www.hardtecs4u.com/reviews/2007/intel_qx6850/index9.php
duh, and Intels 130W Quad is actually a 85W parts in Amd's terms.
Post a Comment
<< Home