Saturday, May 12, 2007

Fun video

Pretty good. Bill Gates laughed out loud seeing this: these idiots, paying me billions of dollars.

14 Comments:

Blogger Aaron said...

funny video

Even better check this one

8:43 PM, May 12, 2007  
Blogger rathor said...

Intel's only chance to compete against AMD's next generation processors:

copy/paste AMD tech.........

10:41 PM, May 12, 2007  
Blogger Bruno Dieter Chan said...

http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?s=b618e734a83da6d06957fd5f05e6f29a&t=153112

12:32 AM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger pezal said...

Ekekeke... Whats a funny videos sharikou & aaron..

You guys notice something unusual here? Seems like all the intelers got nothing to comments anymore on your blog sharikou.. ;-)

6:44 AM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger Evil said...

rathor said...
Intel's only chance to compete against AMD's next generation processors:

copy/paste AMD tech.........


Never mind the fact that this is the ONLY reason AMD is around... copy/paste Intel tech...

7:34 AM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger Randy Allen said...

If it wasn't for Intel's X86 architecture AMD wouldn't be selling many CPUs at all.

7:55 AM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger mi7chy said...

Randy Allen said...
If it wasn't for Intel's X86 architecture AMD wouldn't be selling many CPUs at all.


That's silly. It's like saying if it wasn't for Ford Model T there wouldn't be Ferrari, Porsche, Lamborghini, etc. Reality is if it wasn't for AMD we'd be stuck with a Ford Pinto clunker.

AMD is the Architecture King and Innovator
- true 64/32-bit design
- high performance, high instructions per cycle
- low power
- integrated memory controller
- hypertransport
- true native dual core and quad core

Intel is a Hack Job
- if you can't compete on architecture then cheat http://www.swallowtail.org/naughty-intel.html
- netbust, if you can't compete on architecture use marketing muscle to pitch high GHz but hiding the fact that a low end AMD at almost half the clock rate outperforms Intel http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=1927&p=7
- high power comsumption, high heat dissipation
- low performance, low instructions per cycle (but great marketing hype)
- bloated cache to make up for architecture deficiences
- phony core 2 dud and phony quad core with scaling performance issues >2 cores, apparently for Intel first to market with a phony is more important

10:34 AM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger R said...

How to load windows Vista; what a hoot! I’m still laughing!

10:54 AM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger Poke said...

"That's silly. It's like saying if it wasn't for Ford Model T there wouldn't be Ferrari, Porsche, Lamborghini, etc. Reality is if it wasn't for AMD we'd be stuck with a Ford Pinto clunker."

And yet, Intel's Core 2 Dud frags every Athlon X2. Talk about superior design. Intel's low end E6600 frags AMD's best, X2 6000+.

2:52 PM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger PENIX said...

These videos are funny, but also very true. AMD continues to innovate in ways that Intel never will.

A video on what it would be like if Intel had not held back the entire industry, would be very interesting. If Intel was not allowed to use anti-competitive practices, AMD would currently be dominating the market. The additional revenue would surely be used for research and the current products would far surpass what we have today.

4:35 PM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger netrama said...

Poke said...
And yet, Intel's Core 2 Dud frags every Athlon X2. Talk about superior design. Intel's low end E6600 frags AMD's best, X2 6000+.


You idiot , you cant get away making FUD statements like this . Show some real concrete Proof.. that can be seen by human eyes ..not some infra red cameras they use to find the winner who won by .0001 seconds in a car race finish.

4:53 PM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger core2dude said...

infra red cameras they use to find the winner who won by .0001 seconds in a car race finish.

Why would they use infra-red cameras for something like that? Their resolution sucks. The wavelength of that light is too long to create a crisp image. And those images are typically monochrome.

I would go for high shutter speed, high ISO optical camera.

Just a thought...

5:17 PM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger Randy Allen said...

And yet, Intel's Core 2 Dud frags every Athlon X2. Talk about superior design. Intel's low end E6600 frags AMD's best, X2 6000+.

Indeed. The E6600 is Intel's sixth fastest CPU and frags a 6000+ by offering a faster performance and lower consumption.

See here for power consumption:

http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q2/core2-qx6800/cine-power-peak.gif

and here for performance:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/cpu/dualcore-roundup/charts/average.png

I also found this on the 2900 power consumption:- http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/7712/r600powerpn5.jpg

In other words, the 6000+ is soundly fragged by Intel's sixth fastest CPU and uses much less power as the results show.

In graphics, 8800 GTS is comparable to the fastest 2900 card, the GTX and Ultra are in a league of their own offering performance no one else can match.

Check the power consumption on the 2900 in the image above, and the performance per watt! AMD ought enter the spaceheater business after all!

QuadFX with dual 2900 graphics cards in Crossfire, heat your whole house with your PC this winter!!

AMD BK Q2'08.

5:59 PM, May 13, 2007  
Blogger Evil said...

PENIX said...
These videos are funny, but also very true. AMD continues to innovate in ways that Intel never will.

You mean like the whole Microprocessor invention?

Nah Intel doesn't know how to innovate...

9:05 PM, May 13, 2007  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home