Study confirms my theory that Intelers have lower IQ
Survey result is here. The study had a sample size of 5000 and found 69% of the people who use Intel powered computers had greater learning difficulties. George Ou immediately comes to mind as an example. The study found AMDers to be smarter.
My old analysis is here, it was based on my observation of the Intelers posting on this blog.
Based on the study, one can conclude that Intel engineers are also dumber than AMD engineers, because Intel engineers use Intel computers and AMDers use Opteron.
posted by Sharikou, Ph. D. @ 4/02/2007 01:09:00 PM
28 Comments:
Only idiots with low IQ's lie about having a doctorate...
Darn it! I knew I had a low IQ. But I was not able to find a single reference to confirm it (probably a consequence of the low IQ). Thanks Sharikou for providing that.
Thankfully, I am not the only idiot in this world. Stephen Hawking uses Intel CPUs as well. So he must also be a retard.
This has to be the "Mother of all Post" Rolled out of my chair in laughter!!!! Keepem coming!!!
Interesting for sure, however I’ve always made the same forgone conclusion but felt it was because there’re more Intel computers or a younger crowd has succumbed to Intel’s marketing.
Off subject; Tomorrow Stephen Hawkin lecture in Pasadena 8:00am Cal Tech (free admission but only first 400)
LOL
First it looked to be a joke, where are the reliable sources about it?
The more market share AMD will gain...ohoh...
This only proves that Sharikou is using an Intel based PC.
AMD claims that it will go BK in 2007!
http://roborat64.blogspot.com/2007/04/advanced-micro-devices-amd-bankruptcy.html
AMD claims that it will go BK in 2007!
Your erroneous and misleading headline would qualify you for work at Intel! They hire deceivers there, you should apply.
AMD did no such claims! That statement was taken from a quarterly report where they are obliged by law to disclaim and outline all risks.
We can find a bunch of shit like that on Intel's statement too.
This comment has been removed by the author.
roborat, that site is absolutly great!
Congratulations are in order.
AMD Video inferior to Intel.
The New AMD 680V Chipset doesn't support HDMI. Can't even do HD output.
The old Intel chipsets do HDMI, making them supperior to AMD.
Jeach!
Your erroneous and misleading headline would qualify you for work at Intel!
Does this apply to Shaikou and his latest post as well?
Our humble host wrote:The study found AMDers to be smarter.
This is actually very bad news for AMD. Why?
1. More stupid people than smart people. The study implies that AMD's market share is upside-limited, and Intel's virtually unlimited.
2. You can't fix stupid. Sure, you can educate stupid people, but that doesn't make smarter- just more knowledgable. So marketing to stupid people won't help. No relief for AMD there.
3. Smart people tend to reproduce at lower rates than stupid people (in general). So Intel's potential market will grow at a more rapid rate than AMD's.
So remind me how this self-congratulatory "survey" is good for AMD?
Our humble host wrote:The study found AMDers to be smarter.
This is actually very bad news for AMD. Why?
Dr. Yield's otherwise sharp brain got impeded by his Intel CPU. Yes, therev are more stupid people that smart people and you can't fix stupid.... BUT, people want to appear to be smart...So once they know the study, they will switch to AMD so they don't get treated like idiots....
This comment has been removed by the author.
Please provide us with the details regarding your ph.d. Where it was acquired from, what field of study, and a link to your thesis so we may all enjoy it...
Otherwise you're the bigger idiot.
April fool? Only people with low IQs are the ones here who lap up the Pretender's BS or is it PHD
Opps is always April 1st at the Prtender PhD's blog.
? What happenend to the many articles about INTEL BK in 2007?
? What happehened to the predictions of 40% market Share in 2007
? Why aren't INTEL CPUs not catching fire anymore?
Its clear if you are smart this is pure entertainment on this site.
There is simply no claim Sharikie has every proven correct at, beginning with his false PhD.
Did you hear ""Windows Vista Capable" Gets Microsoft Sued "
People are sueing Windows for their Vista campaign, but the root cause is the Intel IGP shit ..
"netrama said...
Did you hear ""Windows Vista Capable" Gets Microsoft Sued "
People are sueing Windows for their Vista campaign, but the root cause is the Intel IGP shit .. "
Biggest load of crap I've read today. Intel's IGP is perfectly capable of running Aero - I have it on two laptops and a SFF desktop...not to mention it's been proven on several tech sites...and if you'd take the time to test things yourself instead of regurgitating the pretenders spew you'd know it yourself....
People are sueing Windows for their Vista campaign, but the root cause is the Intel IGP shit
No, it's because AMD's crappy IGPs don't even support shader mode 3. AMD's crappy IGPs are far less advanced than those made by Intel or Nvidia.
AMD yaps about how it's crappy IGPs have better performance, but due to a lack of features they can't even run the latest games that require shader mode 3 support. It also means that AMD IGPs have inferior image quality in games that support but do not require shader mode 3.
if they're indeed less intelligent than their AMD counterpart, as you "concluded", I wonder where this come from?
[url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128924-c,intel/article.html]Link[/url]
while Intel engineers are already working on 80 cores, 62watt, 1.01 teraflops, 5.7Ghz processor, AMD engineers are still tring hard to churn out their Barcelona, which is already delayed.
correction:
website:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128924-c,intel/article.html
the 80 core processor can run 1.81 tereflops @ 5.7, while only consuming 62watts.
P.S. this article is dated Feb 11, 2007. So if anyone had already posted this, I apologize for the repeat.
Shakirou said: ...BUT, people want to appear to be smart...So once they know the study, they will switch to AMD...
This is where your logic falls apart. Stupid people cannot "KNOW" the "study" because they never learn and they never study.
This is unfortunate for AMD just as Dr. Yield pointed out.
This is the same sort of explanation why Windows is so popular compared to UNIX. And since AMD was so dumb enough to target smart people, in the future, it will go the same way as UNIX when LINUX (NVIDIA or VIA in this case) took over the smart crowd.
By then all the smart people that own the obsolete AMD system will feel really STUPID. Only the people that argue for AMD will feel DUMBER.
How's about those ph.d validations? Let's see 'em....
Worlds fastest desktop computer, powered by Intel:
http://www.apple.com/macpro/
This comment has been removed by the author.
another BK warning not just coming from AMD but this time from a Merill Lynch researcher.
http://roborat64.blogspot.com/2007/04/amd-needs-1b-by-q307-or-its-bk.html
I'm sorry but this thread has no redeeming value. The volumes of both companies are too high to allow statistical niching to occur. We're talking something over 200 Million chips a year. The true statistics should show very little variation in consumers but possibly some in the much smaller corporate area.
BTW, Roborat. What is your opinion about the idea that gravity is a weaker force because it is mostly expressed in the 11th dimension? I have to say that I am personally not much of a fan of 11 dimensional String Theory. As far as I can tell it's just where we ended up after Unified, Grand Unified, Super Gravity, and multiple String variations.
Post a Comment
<< Home