Monday, January 31, 2011

Intel Tripped Itself Trying to Imitate AMD Fusion

Over the past decade, Intel did nothing but try to imitate AMD. Several years ago, AMD had the bright idea of Fusion -- combing the CPU and GPGPU to create an APU. To do that, AMD acquired ATI at great cost. Not to be left in the dust, Intel's engineers struggled hard, they spent more sleepless nights digesting the voluminous AMD PDF files, some thousand pages long, laden with cryptic technological talk. They rushed against time. And they shipped the SB chip on time. As AMD's Dx11 enabled Fusion winning praises even from the usual Intel fanbois, with the release of the DX10 capable SB chip, though one generation behind, Intel's troops seem have hit the landmark their emperor demanded.

Now, it's the time to fall from that imperial grace, like those unfortunate Roman emperors who pushed their legions a bridge too far. The chipset supporting the SB infrastructure is plagued with a defective SATA controller, which will result in faulty hard drive operations. For anyone who can spell the word computer, he knows what that means to his crucial business and personal data.

Intel claims that it found a "silicon fix" and the problem will go away in April, hopefully. Meanwhile, Fusion, with its DX11 prowess, is winning the hearts and minds of the unforgiving populace.


Blogger Evil_Merlin said...

Jackass, Intel expects to begin delivering the updated version of the chipset to customers in late February

Get your facts correct Dr. Douche,

11:51 PM, February 01, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This kind of bullshit is exactly why I refuse to use Intel products. Time and time again, they prove themselves to be disgraceful failures in the industry. Only a fool of grotesque ignorance would even entertain the idea of using an Intel product.

1:53 PM, February 02, 2011  
Blogger Evil_Merlin said...

So what about all the fucking mistakes AMD has made over the years you fucking Shiradouce dick sucking moron.

8:00 PM, February 02, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


While not flawless, AMD has a sound track record of high quality and reliability. Intel's record is a consistent record of failure and disgrace. If you were not a fool blinded by rampant fanboyism, you would see this clearly.

8:36 AM, February 08, 2011  
Blogger Evil_Merlin said...

You are a fucking idiot.

Do you REALLY want me to list AMD's issues over the past 10 years???

As for Intel's failure and disgrace, funny they make the fastest server, destkop and notebook processors, that use less power and to more than anything AMD makes.

Them the facts boy. Get with reality and pull Shiadouche's head out of your ass.

12:07 AM, February 12, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, you're fucking idiot, lol

Anyone remember in Pentium 60 times, why their math coprocessor was fastest? Because instead calculating result, it tried to GUESS it :D

12:12 AM, February 14, 2011  
Blogger Evil_Merlin said...

Another Shiradouche fanboi. Or should I say AMD fanboi.

Face it Intel owns the high performance, mid performance and netbook markets.

AMD... doesn't.

Still waiting for that supposed Intel BK shiradouche.

9:35 PM, February 14, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

@evil merilyn,
you're a dick and you look like a dick (red rc fokker photo).
you probably post those retarded comments to have people visit your stupid blog.

12:58 PM, February 15, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

@anon moron
If you are such a big man .. why dont you come out of the closet with your real name you clown ... or shall I say Baron the dickhead?
You have any idea why Bu****Dozer is late? huh? 2009 my ass ... it is 2011 and no BullshitDozer!!
You AMD fan Boiz are just bunch of self playing morons ..
As far as Intel's mistakes ... guess what you moron .. they are still the king and AMD is a small little bitch ...

10:29 PM, February 17, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"As far as Intel's mistakes ... guess what you moron .. they are still the king and AMD is a small little bitch ..."

I like this "eat shit, billions of flies can't be wrong" attitude, lol
No, thanks, though :)

3:31 AM, February 18, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

@ the moron posted @ feb 18 2011 @3:31
your issue is this ... you eat shit all the time ... but think it is french cuisine. AMD is no company to put all your eggs in you clown.
You have anything better than Intel? tell me ... is AMD faster than Intel?
man you are a lost chicken

4:54 PM, February 18, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course AMD is faster, idiot

Why would Intel pay companies like futuremark to make fubar benchmarks?

4:20 AM, February 22, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

AMD fusion is faster than SNB? you are one real MORON ...
Again I said that Atom is basically a P3, you compare fusion to P3?
LOL ... I guess medical marijuana is messing up more than just your brain! :p

6:27 PM, February 22, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Zacate HTPC already build and works like a charm...1920x1080 on 60" LG plasma, even some games are playable on that resolution...all for around $200

4:24 AM, March 09, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

LOL "playable" ... you are a moron.

9:05 PM, March 13, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, you are moron if you pay twice as much to buy Intel proc when you can have whole system for half the price :D

6:25 AM, March 15, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Moron .... you get what you pay for, " a whole system for 1/2" ... Moron .... the only subsystem that can cost less is CPU the rest of teh stuff cant be 1/2 off because you buy AMD ... god damn AMD MORON fans ... SND is wiping the floor with even the fastest AMD chips ... talk about that

10:40 AM, April 17, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

AMD systems are the epitome of garbage.

4:55 PM, May 10, 2011  

Post a Comment

<< Home