Journal of Pervasive 64 bit Computing
Main Blog Page
sharikou.blogspot.com/atom.xml
Blog Roll
Hot pages
- Price War Strategic Analysis
- AMD and Intel Performance
- Intel's false performance claims
- AMD's Architecture Lead Persists
- AMD and Intel Performance
- AMD and Intel Architecture
- Bensley/Woodcrest and Athlon MP
- Bensley/Woodcrest is 2P only
- 64bit CORE Performance!
- Conroe Busted
- Capacity: AMD vs Intel
- Conroe's Impact
- AMD and Intel in China
- A Beautiful Picture!
- Temperature and System Reliability
- Google and AMD
- AMD's Grand Masters
- Intel's Predicament
- AMD and Dell
- NGMA Core and Colwell 6th Gen Arch
- AMD and Intel History
- The Tale of Intel and Anand
Analysis on IT trends and competitive strategies, with emphasis on micro processors, computer systems and networks. Based on latest news, backed up with real data, this site intends to provide a true and realtime picture of the fast changing IT landscape. This journal strives to be accurate on facts and sharp on criticisms. You may email your opinion to sharikou@yahoo.com or post comments here, be cool and intelligent.
About Me
- Name: Sharikou, Ph. D.
Freelance journalist on IT matters. Some of my writings have been published on online IT journals. Any original content on this journal is Copyrighted, but it's free for non-commercial use. Any Trademarks used on this site belong to their respective owners. Some of the pictures are links. If there is any issue with the content of this site, please email sharikou@yahoo.com .
Previous Posts
- Fired Tech Employee Fired
- Intel begged Microsoft to Lower Vista Standard
- Nvidia the pitiful: two HD 4830 pwned GTX 280
- AMD to fatally frag Intel in HD Video Encoding Per...
- AMD Shanghai Slaughters Intel in SpecInt_rate
- AMD is gonna smash Atom
- 2.7GHz Shanghai Frags 3.0GHz Intel Quad
- AMD to Revoke Intel's AMD64, HyperTransport and Di...
- Boosted my old computer 3x with Phenom X3
- AMD's pricing is too attractive to be true
Friday, November 21, 2008
6 Comments:
And even with those numbers AMD still cannot match those of Intel.
The Office FX addon is nice.
This chart looks impressive and shows AMD is on the right track.
Intel Core I7 is already one big failure of CPU with it's expensive price tag, expensive DDR3, Ripp-off Motherboard prices and all this cash gains users minimal performance gains over last generation Intel CPU junk. Intel I7is just another Gimmick.
Intel fanboys think AMD is financially crippled because they can't compete, but AMD's predicament is because of Intel's anti-competitive behavior. AMD are the company that has innovated, while Intel has sat back and stolen AMD's ideas. I want reliable and crash free computing so I choose AMD, INTEL SUCK!
6.3GHz Phenom II is due out soon. It looks like Intel is finished once and for all.
CupCake; using some of the same technical solutions as AMD is like using plastic containers for juice rather than paper. Intel knew it was possible to use plastic containers, but they chose another solution.
Some things can only be designed one way; of course Intel used somewhat the same design as AMD. It's like designing a nut cracker; you have to have something to crack the nut open. The many nut cracker functions has to be somewhat the same.
IMC, 64-bit tech and direct communication (call it whatever you want) are elementary differences in the design. Intel has known for centuries that such options would become a reality sooner or later. It's not like AMD all of a sudden had a genious plan that no one else had thought of.
If one of these elements can only work when designed the same way AMD did, Intel couldn't choose a very different solutions. I'm sorry if you still fail to see my point.
It's not like AMD came up with the big idea of integrating the memory controllers, or making cores communicate in a more direct way. These are all choices that for a long time have been options when designing a CPU.
When AMD chose to take several of them in use in their CPU design (which I agree, was an excellent choice by AMD), Intel had to do the same thing to be compeditive (but at a later point). AMD obvoiusly chose one of the best ways to implement them, and Intel could not choose a very different design in order to make it work. What I'm saying is that Intel would have done it the same way, even without looking at how AMD's design.
Fan boys lose some of their logic sense, in order to make things look the way they want. You're not getting any smarter by locking your direction of thoughts.
Post a Comment
<< Home