Rahul needs a philoshopy lesson
Rahul expressed his disblief on the Journal of Pervasive 64 bit Computing. I read news every day, and I fully understand Rahul's feelings. He is an AMD fan. He likes to see AMD win, though he pretends to be fair to Intel. But, as almost everyone else, his vision is way too short.
I simply think on a larger time scale. When you look at problems at larger scale, the fluctuations get smeared out.
AMD is indeed in an enivable position. 1Q07 was AMD's moment of awakening. As a result, it has tons of x2 inventory that it can flood the market like hell, and it has the K10 killer right behind that flood, and DELL, HP, Lenovo, Acer, SUN, IBM and everyone else (except a few corrupt Japanese vendors) will hype K10 like crazy. Intel's fastest chip will be slower than AMD's slowest.
Hector Ruiz described the future quite figuratively: AMD will launch a Tsunami of new products. What Intel will see will not be a huge wave caused by a Typhoon, but a giant body of water 500 feet high and with wavelength of 5 miles -- the drowning liquid just keeps coming and coming.
I re-iterate my projection that Intel BK by 2Q08.
posted by Sharikou, Ph. D. @ 5/14/2007 09:54:00 PM
23 Comments:
Intel BQ by 2Q08? IT is possible! 3Q08 more likely ;)
You just got pwned by one of the most respected members of the semiconductor business community. At least he has time to acknowledge you, so you can be content knowing that you are a step above Penix, The Khalif and that ekekekeke guy.
SUN is going Intel. They've seen the K10 benchmarks and know that it will be a total flop. In fact, Sun showed off a 4P, 16 core Tigerton system at IDF in Beijing.
Rahul expressed his disblief on the Journal of Pervasive 64 bit Computing...
Actually he isolated you as the only AMD fanboy not in a "tizzy" and was asking what you were smoking. "Disbelief" is the last thing it means. Try ridicule and mockery.
Poor Ph(ake)d... he got pasted... bad...
pwned is right.
Sleep well fanbois ya'll been pwned by one of the more AMD positive guys around...
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=982&Itemid=1
50 to 100 per cent faster than QX6700
HO HO HO... Intel's end is near... HO HO HO !!!
Some people said R600 is designed for DX10 games. This is simply false. See these results:
http://www.fudzilla.com/images/stories/2007/May/general%20news/lp_dx10_snow.jpg
The Geforce 8800 Ultra is over 3x faster than the HD2900 XT. No one will want that crap.
As i said before,HD2900XT is designed for DX10 games..
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/504/3/
"50 to 100 per cent faster than QX6700" no longer?? looks like the fun police have got that story pulled?
This comment has been removed by the author.
You got served.
As i said before,HD2900XT is designed for DX10 games...
So once again, the AMD fanboi's are trying to use a review, but failed to READ it all:
What started out as a benchmark that was sure to destroy NVIDIA and praise ATI actually showed that NVIDIA had better image quality and performed better at lower (playable) resolutions.
So Pezal, care to comment...
PS: What the HELL does philoshopy mean? Did Ph(ake)d mean philosophy? One would think that someone claiming to have a PhD would also be smart enough to use a spell checker before posting... Then again, we are talking about someone who claims Intel is going to be BK in Q2 of 2008....
This comment has been removed by the author.
So Pezal, care to comment..
May i ask you one question mr stupid evil? when you play a 3D games, You prefer to play the games at lower resolution or high?
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Muhahahaha.. This is the true picture how AMD Barcelona frogging, tortoising, and donkeying the Intel fastest CPU QX6700.. wakakkakaka...
http://aycu28.webshots.com/image/17787/2004243189200283099_rs.jpg
I think, Intel need to cut the price of QX6700 to only $26.60 this Q3.. Wakakakakakaka...
wakawakawaka...
Thats a real impressive "The webpage cannot be found" you linked there Pezal.
PS: You prefer to play the games at lower resolution or high?
I prefer to play at resolution that allows me to have all the eye candy my 3D game can give me. Which AMD is currently having issues doing... Not to mention that all of today's current games can be played on NVidia's hardware at a higher resolution, with more eye candy for today's games. See the HardOCP review for more FACTUAL data... of course you will now move your goal post per the deep rooted fanboi in you...
As i said before,HD2900XT is designed for DX10 games.
Well then, here you go. Benchmarks of an AMD supplied DX10 game demo.
In case you don't want to read the article, The mid range Nvidia card kicks the crap out of the 2900XT.
http://www.dailytech.com/DailyTech+Digest+DirectX+10+Performance/article7281.htm
The whole story:
http://www.dailytech.com/Barcelona+Benchmarks++Dont+Believe+Em+Just+Yet/article7291.htm
...and i re-iterate my stance of "sharikou's blog lost all possible credibility by 2Q08".
we shall see then.
pezal
Sorry, but those Sandra scores are fake. But they are not needed; they are about 3X the improvement that AMD claims.
Man, I have no idea where your ideas come from...
You should do yourself a favor and tell everyone it was all a gag, and convert your site into a "Fake Steve Jobs" type site.. You've gone way over the edge with your predictions. Intel BK in Q208? I'll bet my entire life savings you're wrong.
Post a Comment
<< Home