Analysis on IT trends and competitive strategies, with emphasis on micro processors, computer systems and networks. Based on latest news, backed up with real data, this site intends to provide a true and realtime picture of the fast changing IT landscape. This journal strives to be accurate on facts and sharp on criticisms. You may email your opinion to sharikou@yahoo.com or post comments here, be cool and intelligent.
Freelance journalist on IT matters. Some of my writings have been published on online IT journals. Any original content on this journal is Copyrighted, but it's free for non-commercial use. Any Trademarks used on this site belong to their respective owners. Some of the pictures are links. If there is any issue with the content of this site, please email sharikou@yahoo.com .
Xbitlabs did some tests, and found the 65nm Presler Pentium D 930 slower than the slowest AMD dual core, the Athlon 64 X2 3800+. An overclocked Presler Pentium D at 4GHZ is about 20% slower than the AMD's flasgship FX60 in some tests. It seems AMD's price premium over Intel is well justified.
posted by Sharikou, Ph. D. @ 3/21/2006 11:04:00 AM
2 Comments:
sharikou as you may read here:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30426
even the 2.93 GHz Core Duo is faster than 3.4 GHz Athlon FX-60. Conroe will crush AMD.....
The only reliable core duo test available today is the one from AnandTech. Which shows that Core Duo 2GHZ generally slower than Athlon 64 X2 3800+. We have covered it on this jorunal before, and we showed Core Duo as an inefficient architecture, as the X2 3800+ has only half the cache.
Please do not post the same message twice. Duplicated messages will be removed.
Post a Comment
<< Home